Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
Buddy Page
View Profile
« January 2006 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Johnny LaRue's Crane Shot
Tuesday, January 3, 2006
'Twas Peter Jackson's Ego That Killed This Beast
Now Playing: KING KONG (2005)
The best thing I can say about KING KONG is that there's a really good two-hour movie in there.

* Did we really need two scenes where Ann entertains Kong with her vaudeville routine? The second one where she juggles is wonderful, but its impact is slighter than it should have been, since we have already seen her do this.

* Did we really need two scenes where Englehorn comes out of nowhere (and unbelievably quickly too, judging from the timeline) to save the cast? Smells like lazy writing.

* If Jackson wanted to make a movie about Jimmy the Stowaway and His Dignified Black Friend Hayes, I wish he had so I could have elected to not see it. I have no idea why these characters got so much screen time. They added nothing emotionally or narratively that I noticed.

* Will directors please learn that slow motion is not scary nor does it build suspense? The only scene worse than a minute-and-a-half of Naomi Watts looking at chloroform bottles in slow motion is Adrien Brody's typewriter spelling S-K-U-L-L-I-S-L-A-N-D one letter at a time.

* Jimmy fires a machine gun point-blank at Driscoll...and amazingly only hits the small creatures crawling on him!

* Ann Darrow should be a stuntwoman, not an actress. Not only can she easily fall hundreds of feet, bouncing off walls and vines on the way down, without even getting one scratch on her (or a smudge of mud), she doesn't even suffer whiplash from being tossed and whipped around at high speeds. Heck, she can even stand on top of the Empire State Building in the dead of winter without getting cold or being blown off.

* Peter Jackson obviously never learned that Less Is More. Kong fights a pterodactyl in the 1933 movie, so he has to fight 20 million giant bats in this one.

* Argh, the pacing was so off. It isn't so much that entire scenes needed to be snipped out (although some do--ice skating sequence, I'm talking to you), but several shots and scenes go on forever. Was it necessary for the final goodbye between Kong and Ann to take three or four minutes? Does it really take more than 25 seconds for us to get The Point that She Feels Sympathy For The Big Brute?

* The original filmmakers shot a spider pit sequence too, but they removed it because it stopped the story. That doesn't stop Peter Jackson, to whom story and pacing take a backseat to his own ego. His spider pit scene also halts the film's momentum, although it certainly isn't the only one.

As I said, there's a good movie trapped beneath all the fat. Naomi Watts is terrific. No question that if a giant monkey was to fall in love with a human female, she would be Naomi Watts. The rest of the cast was fine as well. I even thought Jack Black was okay, although it was a mistake for Jackson to make him such an unrepentant asshole and then not punish him for it. Robert Armstrong survived the '33 KONG, but his huckster was likable in a way that Black is not. Charles Grodin played Denham as a jackass and got squashed to audience applause.

Most of the visual effects are excellent. I'm not a CGI enthusiast, but the matte renderings of New York City were wonderful, and I have nothing but praise for the exciting biplane climax.

The music is drab, not that you can hear beneath all the caterwauling and sound effects. Considering James Newton Howard's score was a late replacement for Howard Shore's, I wonder how "bad" Shore's must have been. I have a hunch it's actually better.

Those who watch the closing crawl will discover a sweet acknowledgement of Merian Cooper, Ernest Schoedsack, Willis O'Brien, Robert Armstrong and "the incomparable Fay Wray"'s inspiration.

Jackson deserves his props for putting the Wilhelm Scream in his movie. Did you hear it?

Posted by Marty at 7:13 PM CST
Updated: Tuesday, January 3, 2006 7:21 PM CST
Post Comment | View Comments (5) | Permalink

Tuesday, January 3, 2006 - 8:32 PM CST

Name: kt

i knew you'd make all those comments. what about the really long bug attack scene - that was the worst and could have been edited.

i liked the dinosaurs falling (bronosauruses) and i liked the t-rex fight with king kong. i think that was worth the movie.

it is easy for me to ignore the unnecessary character building to see what i want to see. that's whati have to do every day.

why weren't you at work today.

Tuesday, January 3, 2006 - 11:46 PM CST

Name: Tolemite

i think i'm going to see this on Saturday, but i already lament the lack of a Totzilla.

it'll certainly be enjoyable, but it's a damn shame that no movie studio would give that kind of money to an original story. looks like this cinema-loving generation doesn't get to have any tales of its own.

Wednesday, January 4, 2006 - 2:07 PM CST

Name: Toler 2.0

I have always loved the 1933 version of King Kong. I was pleased to see that some of the original lines and situations were used in Peter Jackson's portrayal. However, some of the differences were disappointing. Where was the famous "hand in the window" scene? Why wasn't the real Ann dangled in front of Kong in NY? As we all know, that's what drives Kong to break the "chrome steel", not the cameras.

I thought it was amusing that the unveiling of Kong was very similar to the original tribal wedding on Skull Island. Guys in gorilla costumes dancing around, the witchdoctor and the islanders were dressed like the '33 version, even the music and chant were the same.

A lot of scenes could have been cut. The Jimmy/Mr. Hayes thing went nowhere. I thought Jimmy might have joined the military and be in one of those planes to avenge Mr. Hayes' death. The T-Rex fight went on WAY to long. The bug scene was a waste of time (and Driscoll should have been shot). Overall it was entertaining, but Jackson needs to learn how to shorten his movies.

Did anyone else notice that Kong seemed to be different sizes at different times of the movie? It could have been me but sometimes he seemed absolutely huge, other times not so much.

I'm starting to think every movie has a Wilhelm Scream. I pretty sure MALONE has one, maybe two.

Wednesday, January 4, 2006 - 3:13 PM CST

Name: dj_jbrown

How many total films has the Wilhelm scream starred in to date?

Wednesday, January 4, 2006 - 8:17 PM CST

Name: Tolemite

i think each of the LOTR movies have the Wilhelm. at least one of the Indiana Jones movies has it. Marty sent a list out awhile back.

View Latest Entries