Tuesday, June 6, 2006 - 9:44 AM CDT

The Bush Cartel is "working hard" pandering to the 29% (or less) of the country that doesn't completely despise them, despite the fact that it's obvious there isn't a snowball's chance in hell of this passing.

"Activist Judges" has become the Republican's favorite new bogeyman since the myth of the "Liberal Media" has become recognized as a blatant lie (not that the Right-Wing Corporate Media would actually call them on it).

Tuesday, June 6, 2006 - 9:46 AM CDT

You know, Kanye West caught so much shit for his "George Bush doesn't care about black people comment" but he was fucking dead on. The only black people (or people of any minority group) the shrub cares about are those than can help him further his neo-theocratic agenda. If only someone would catch Condy Rice going down on GB, then we could impeach him.

Every time my anger and frustration with these bastards slows down to, say, a roiling boil, something like this anti-gay marriage thing come up and the pot boils over again.

(I initially typed "eno-theoractic" which conjures up images of Brian Eno twiddling an old anlogue synth in the oval office.)

Tuesday, June 6, 2006 - 2:46 PM CDT

I have no idea what race has to do with what Bush is doing. Way to uphold liberal stereotypes and pull out the race card for no apparent reason.

Tuesday, June 6, 2006 - 3:40 PM CDT

You don't know or you don't care to know? The reason is obvious.

Tuesday, June 6, 2006 - 3:43 PM CDT

Your claim of ignorance regarding this matter, whether real or feigned, in no way refutes Marty's observations concerning the analogous civil rights issues he mentioned.

When you decide to grow a brain and want to participate in conversations like an adult, you'll be afforded less-dismissive responses.

Tuesday, June 6, 2006 - 4:53 PM CDT

Again, I am truly amazed at people that take a political issue and see it as (forgive the phrase) black or white. There are several reasons to support a ban on homosexual unions. The most obivious would be religious beliefs. Also, stating that activist judges don't exist is crazy. The fact that Mass. had to pass a law becasue the judiciary told them to do it, should be one hint. There isn't one current politician (judges are politicians also) that would survive if the public actually took a 'thinking' instead of 'feeling' approach to politics. Stop thinking left or right, blue or red, start thinking. Please don't start the name-calling because I don't agree with your opinion, appreciate the fact that we live in a country that one can disagree. And a little respect for any President should be shown by adults, the going down comment shouldn't have even been typed.

Tuesday, June 6, 2006 - 5:26 PM CDT

Why should somebody else's religious beliefs have any legal say over who I can marry?

Tuesday, June 6, 2006 - 7:28 PM CDT

Sorry if this posts twice.....I'm new to this blogging thing.

Shouldn't all of your decisions, including who receives your vote, be based on your beliefs? Wouldn't you hope that the person that got your vote carried out your wishes based on shared beliefs? I guess you could vote based on the letter after their name, R or D.

My beliefs have no effect on who/what you marry, love or screw. My 'bigotry' is based on what I believe to be a marriage.

Since Marty failed to mention any bad decisions judges have made in the past, a Lutheran high school (Hack's church) must readmit two lesbian girls. How long before the school is prohibited from discussing the sin of homosexuality?